WNBA fans defend Caitlin Clark after losing AP votes to controversial Olympic boxer
Clark’s groundbreaking season earns her AP Female Athlete of the Year, but critics question the panel’s voting choices
WNBA Fans Slam AP Panel After Caitlin Clark Loses Votes to Gender-Debate BoxerLAPRESSE
Caitlin Clark’s stellar debut WNBA season earned her the Associated Press (AP) Rookie of the Year and Female Athlete of the Year honors in 2024. While the latter accolade was expected after Clark’s meteoric rise, it wasn’t without controversy, as a few votes went to other athletes, including Olympic gymnast Simone Biles and boxer Imane Khelif, whose Paris Olympics performance stirred public debate.
Clark secured 35 of the 74 votes from AP journalists, while Biles received 25. Khelif placed third with four votes, despite widespread criticism surrounding her inclusion in the voting due to controversies related to gender debates during her Olympic run. The voting sparked a passionate response from WNBA fans, many of whom took to social media to defend Clark’s win and criticize the panel’s decisions.
Caitlin Clark has a joyful response when she signs autographs for her youngest fans ever
“Khelif getting any votes is absurd,” one fan wrote, referencing the backlash surrounding Khelif’s participation in women’s boxing. Others expressed skepticism about the legitimacy of the votes, with one quipping, “Must’ve been Caitlin Clark’s ‘privilege’ that got her named Female Athlete of the Year-because dominating the court and redefining women’s basketball isn’t enough anymore.”
Clark, who addressed issues of race and privilege in her TIME Athlete of the Year profile, has faced polarized reactions from fans. While many praised her for using her platform to support Black athletes, others criticized her comments as unnecessary or performative. “CC disappointed me with her white privilege crap, but she is very talented. Glad to see an actual woman win this award,” one social media user posted.
Caitlin Clark’s historic impact on Women’s Basketball
Despite the drama, Clark’s impact on women’s basketball is undeniable. ESPN analyst and former AP Female Athlete of the Year Rebecca Lobo praised Clark for bringing unprecedented attention to the WNBA. “She’s elevated the sport in a way we’ve never seen before,” Lobo told AP, adding that Clark’s composure under scrutiny has been remarkable.
Clark’s Indiana Fever team shattered attendance records, averaging over 17,000 fans per game, while the WNBA saw a 48% overall increase in attendance compared to the previous season. Her Rookie of the Year campaign was capped by game-changing performances that drew millions of viewers, bolstering the league’s profile.
MORE in MARCA
Paige Spiranac leaves everyone open-mouthed with a daring Farrah Fawcett look: ‘Up close and personal’ | MarcaMarca
Travis Hunter’s breakup with girlfriend Leanna Lenee ahead of NFL draft is already available for betting | MarcaMarca
The uproar over the voting also highlights ongoing cultural debates in sports, with some fans expressing frustration at the inclusion of athletes like Khelif in categories traditionally reserved for women (even if she is one).
As Clark continues to shine, the controversy underscores her dual role as an athlete and cultural figure navigating the complexities of modern sports.
Did Nike just miss a $27 billion opportunity with Caitlin Clark?
Fans and experts point to Nike’s neglect of Caitlin Clark’s brand as a key factor in a staggering market value loss.
Caitling ClarkAP Photo
Caitlin Clark has become a household name in sports, redefining marketability for WNBA players and breaking barriers both on and off the court. As the No. 1 pick in the 2024 WNBA Draft, the Indiana Fever guard quickly inked an eight-year, $20 million deal with Nike. However, a year later, many are questioning whether Nike underestimated her potential-and the consequences could be dire.
Despite her historic rookie season, during which Clark helped the WNBA reach record-breaking television ratings and attendance, Nike has failed to position her as a centerpiece of its marketing efforts. Fans expected a signature sneaker deal to follow her groundbreaking first season, but instead, Nike’s focus shifted elsewhere.
Caitlin Clark shines in first workout with new Indiana Fever head coach Stephanie White
Missed opportunities and massive losses
According to The Assist Network, Nike’s neglect of Clark’s brand coincided with a dismal sales quarter, resulting in a jaw-dropping $27 billion decline in market value. The report sparked outrage among Clark’s devoted fanbase, who believe the company has underestimated her influence as the driving force behind the WNBA’s surge in popularity.
Paige Bueckers’ signature shoe raises eyebrows
Adding fuel to the fire, Nike recently unveiled the Paige Bueckers x Nike GT Hustle 3 collaboration, making Bueckers the first college athlete with a signature sneaker. While the UConn star is undoubtedly a rising talent, the decision left fans questioning why Clark already a professional and arguably the league’s most marketable player has yet to receive the same recognition.
Caitlin Clark’s contributions to the WNBA’s growth are unparalleled. Her magnetic presence has elevated the league to new heights, creating an unprecedented buzz around women’s basketball. Fans argue that Nike’s prioritization of Bueckers over Clark reflects a fundamental miscalculation of market demand.
