Taylor Swift in suiteTaylor Swift (Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images)
What has happened to Taylor Swift?

Does Taylor Swift have a drinking problem? - The Spectator World

Swift missed the last two games for the Kansas City Chiefs, which left many wondering if there was trouble in paradise.

After missing her second Chiefs game in a row, some fans are starting to wonder if the two have reached a rough patch in the relationship.

The 14-time Grammy winner appeared to miss boyfriend Travis Kelce’s Chiefs game on Sunday against the Chargers at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles, one week after skipping Kansas City’s primetime win over the Falcons.

 

Without Taylor Swift in the second missed game, Kelce had his best game of the season with seven catches for 89 yards.

According to TMZ Sports, nothing is going on behind the scenes with Swift and her boyfriend, Travis Kelce.

“Sources familiar with the couple tell TMZ … Taylor and Travis remain a couple, even though she hasn’t been able to make it to his last two games in Atlanta and Los Angeles.

Taylor was at Travis’ first two games this year, both in Kansas City, but she’s been MIA since … including a game at SoFi Stadium, where she had a bunch of concerts.

She was a staple at games last season, and fans are starting to get worried about trouble in paradise … but we’re told that’s simply not the case here.”

The 34-year-old cheered on Kelce at Arrowhead Stadium the first two weeks of the season, both of which were Chiefs wins.

Without her, they are also 2-0.

Does A Breakup Contract Between Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Actually Exist?

Taylor Swift has been missing in action.

The 34-year-old has been a mainstay in VIP boxes across the country for Kansas City Chiefs football games since she began dating Travis Kelce, but she has been missing for two games now.

Despite being together for over a year, an online document suggested that their romance was merely a publicity stunt.

Buzz circulated around a so-called “breakup contract” that suggested the couple parted ways on September 28.

Full Scope branded it as “entirely false and fabricated and were not created, issued or authorised by this agency.”

“Identifying the perpetrator may prove challenging, but the company is taking the matter very seriously,” they said. “We have engaged our legal team to initiate proceedings against the individuals or entities responsible for the unlawful and injurious forgery of documents.”